Hi,
On 03/25/2011 04:42 PM, ext Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Tiago Vignatti<tiago.vigna...@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:31:41 +0200
Sorry, but what gives you the authority to say this debug code isn't useful?
The code inside DEBUG is deliberately useless and the one in FONTDEBUG
could be simply changed by DebugF, but I think rarely a developer will
want to use it.
What are you suggesting then?
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti<tiago.vigna...@nokia.com>
---
dix/dixfonts.c | 12 ------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/dixfonts.c b/dix/dixfonts.c
index d8f1529..316a8a5 100644
--- a/dix/dixfonts.c
+++ b/dix/dixfonts.c
@@ -66,10 +66,6 @@ Equipment Corporation.
#include "dixfont.h"
#include "xace.h"
-#ifdef DEBUG
-#include <stdio.h>
-#endif
-
#ifdef XF86BIGFONT
#include "xf86bigfontsrv.h"
#endif
@@ -391,14 +387,6 @@ OpenFont(ClientPtr client, XID fid, Mask flags, unsigned
lenfname, char *pfontna
int i;
FontPtr cached = (FontPtr)0;
-#ifdef FONTDEBUG
- char *f;
- f = malloc(lenfname + 1);
- memmove(f, pfontname, lenfname);
- f[lenfname] = '\0';
- ErrorF("[dix] OpenFont: fontname is \"%s\"\n", f);
- free(f);
-#endif
if (!lenfname || lenfname> XLFDMAXFONTNAMELEN)
return BadName;
if (patternCache)
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
