On 3/29/11 4:49 PM, John Martin wrote:
On 03/29/11 04:14 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Consider, as a counterexample, that there exist only two variables in
the core X server that are volatile, and yet we do a very similar
resize-the-array move all the time. Is this because X is broken, or is
this because your understanding of volatile is faulty?
I understand the volatile behavior as defined by the C standard.
I also work in an environment where different compilers and
compile options can be used, which spurs a bit of paranoia.
If this use of this qualifier in platform specific code is going
to cause the community sleepless nights, I can remove it.
You're building libpciaccess, and only libpciaccess, with a compiler
less competent than gcc 2.7? Must be rough.
The r-b stands, feel free to merge.
- ajax
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
