On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 02:07:40PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Mika Blanc <mika.bl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This patch adds a boolean "DRI" option to the mach64 driver. Direct > > rendering can be either enabled (default) or disabled with this option. > > Is DRI enabled by default really the right thing to do for a driver > whose DRM components never made it upstream into the Linux kernel?
As I read the patch, it leaves the existing behavior alone but adds the option to explicitly disable DRI. So I assume that somewhere outside the diff context is code to try using DRI, and fall back to non-DRI if needed. As a result, this seems like a sensible patch to me. Jamey
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
