On 09/16/11 01:54, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
A bonus would be a list of drivers that do use pciaccess (maybe not in
the commit text!). A complete list of drivers can be found in build.sh.
Here's a complete list of modules which didn't contain the links *BEFORE* my
change:
./drivers/chips_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/chips_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/cirrus_alpine.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/cirrus_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/glint_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/glint_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/i128_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/intel_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/mach64_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/mach64_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/mga_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/mga_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/neomagic_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/neomagic_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/nouveau_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/nv_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/nv_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/openchrome_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/openchrome_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/r128_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/r128_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/r300_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/rendition_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/savage_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/savage_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/sis_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/sis_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/sunleo_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/tdfx_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/tdfx_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/tga_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/trident_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/trident_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/tseng_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/vesa_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/vmwlegacy_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/vmwlegacy_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/voodoo_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/xgi_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/xgi_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
./drivers/xgixp_drv.so: needs_pciaccess=1
./drivers/xgixp_drv.so: needs_pixman=1
Which goes back to another question raised at XDC - is it time to start
dropping support for video drivers the way we have for input drivers?
rendition is one of my favorite examples there - it's so old that
Windows support isn't available for anything newer than Windows 98.
Since Solaris 11 dropped 32-bit CPU support and is going 64-bit only,
the list of video drivers we'll be shipping shrunk dramatically, based
on those we expected to see in x64 systems, and is just:
xf86-video-ast xf86-video-mach64 xf86-video-trident
xf86-video-ati xf86-video-mga xf86-video-vesa
xf86-video-cirrus xf86-video-nv xf86-video-vmware
xf86-video-dummy xf86-video-openchrome
xf86-video-intel xf86-video-r128
Besides the obvious ones, Cirrus survived mainly for the emulated forms in
qemu & similar virtualization, Trident because Sun shipped one on board in
one of our early AMD64 servers (the Sun Fire V20z), Matrox because of the
number of server/blade systems using service processors such as those from
Emulex with G200SE & similar graphics. I don't actually have a good reason
why "nv" survived since we ship the nvidia proprietary driver.
On the sparc side, we just ship ast & ati, since that's all that's supported in
the SPARC server models that Solaris 11 officially supports.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
