On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@centrum.cz> wrote: > On 22 September 2011 19:34, Alan Coopersmith > <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote: >> On 09/22/11 08:32, Michal Suchanek wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Can anybody, please, explain how this bug[1] could have remained in >>> Xorg for two years assuming any sanity is remaining among Xorg >>> developers? >> >> If we were sane, we wouldn't still be working on X, especially not >> after people pile on abuse for things like that. >> > > There are obviously people sabotaging X already since the change went > in more than two years ago and stayed in spite of being pointed out as > bogus. > > I can understand that it is not possible to fix all issues at once or > that implementing new features may bring new bugs but actively > breaking a previously working feature is a different thing altogether. > > If "we won't talk about this" is the only answer then that's also an > answer I guess.
Feel free to deal with all the "my fonts are too big" bugs that come up when the xserver uses the real dpi. A lot of people expect a hardcoded 96 dpi whether it makes sense or not. Alex _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
