Should those commit messages really have "v2" and "v3" in them? It sounds like they were updated based on feedback during review, which isn't really something that needs to be mentioned in the commit log...
On Oct 20, 2011, at 01:52, Dave Airlie wrote: > Fixes from RHEL coverity scan + fbdev work. > > The following changes since commit c8413362049cee8c30e0a9d67f78f9ebefe8e71f: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'herrb/master' (2011-10-18 07:45:24 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > ssh://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/xserver rhel-fixes > > Adam Jackson (1): > fbdevhw: iterate over all modes that match a mode. (v3) > > Dave Airlie (4): > xext: don't free uninitialised pointer when malloc fails. (v2) > Xi: avoid overrun of callback array. > kinput: allocate enough space for null character. > xaa: avoid possible freed pointer reuse in epilogue > > Xext/saver.c | 3 +-- > Xi/extinit.c | 4 ++-- > hw/kdrive/src/kinput.c | 2 +- > hw/xfree86/fbdevhw/fbdevhw.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > hw/xfree86/xaa/xaaGC.c | 1 + > 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
