On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 18:11:22 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:58:09PM -0800, Jamey Sharp wrote: > > I'm entirely in favor of this goal. But I'd really like to see > > newly-developed X library APIs exposed as pure XCB APIs at this point. > > Pretty much everyone is shipping Xlib/XCB now, so it's no hardship for > > higher-layer Xlib-based code to call XCB-only libraries, and doing it > > now saves us having to migrate callers later. > > Would this require changes to libXrandr, since libXrandrUtils is > intended to wrapper that library? If not, I'd need some guidance but > would be willing to give it a shot. > No, it would mean using libxcb-randr instead of libXrandr.
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
