The biggest (only?) downside is that any one-shot an/or on-going reformatting of _existing_ code confounds future git-annotate and git-bisect :-( _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
- [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Daniel Stone
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Trevor Woerner
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Daniel Stone
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the serv... Keith Packard
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server James Cloos
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Cyril Brulebois
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Alan Coopersmith
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the serv... Matt Dew
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the ... Trevor Woerner
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the serv... James Cloos
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Daniel Stone
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Trevor Woerner
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Alan Coopersmith
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Chase Douglas
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Chase Douglas
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Keith Packard
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Daniel Stone
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Guillem Jover
- Re: [PATCH 1.12] A coding style for the server Daniel Stone