On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:06:20PM -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Thomas Dickey <dic...@his.com> wrote: > > Actually the issue relative to xterm was reported over in GenToo this > > week. > > Samuli and I are Gentoo developers
;-) > > It seems that xorg changes have broken a more than 10-year old > > packaging arrangement. > > Sorry for trying to maintain previously unmaintained software? I do that all the time (and changed defaults usually are a valid bug report). Is your script following the same rules as the plain Xaw in this area? They've always been compile-time interchangeable except for naming of the headers and libraries. > > That's a bug in your code, and cannot be excused by citing a user request > > to provide configurability. > > Not sure who or what you mean. It was certainly a bug in Gentoo -- I > didn't provide a knob to configure this feature. #399859 is the place to look. -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel