On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:06:20PM -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Thomas Dickey <dic...@his.com> wrote:
> > Actually the issue relative to xterm was reported over in GenToo this
> > week.
> 
> Samuli and I are Gentoo developers

;-)
 
> > It seems that xorg changes have broken a more than 10-year old
> > packaging arrangement.
> 
> Sorry for trying to maintain previously unmaintained software?

I do that all the time (and changed defaults usually are a valid bug report).

Is your script following the same rules as the plain Xaw in this area?
They've always been compile-time interchangeable except for naming
of the headers and libraries.
 
> > That's a bug in your code, and cannot be excused by citing a user request
> > to provide configurability.
> 
> Not sure who or what you mean. It was certainly a bug in Gentoo -- I
> didn't provide a knob to configure this feature.

#399859 is the place to look.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to