Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> writes: > It seems wierd that we have the GC carrying around a pointer to each > of these, when I don't see any evidence we can't just stash one set of > ops/funcs per screen. > > Did we every, do we currently to anyone knowledge modify gc ops or > funcs at anything less than a screen level?
yes, we used to do this all the time in ValdiateGC where each GC was 'optimized' to point at funcs that were tuned for the current GC state. I eliminated that in fb, and most drivers seem to have followed suit in the years since. I intended that these should eventually live in the screen pointer; please go for it! -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpasQyCDaD0e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
