On 26/10/12 14:26, Jon TURNEY wrote: >> That's probably more accurate. >> I could probably implement it in a couple of hours, but there's little >> incentive to do it so far without with no usage. (and CreateProcess is >> quite ugly...) > > If you don't have any other issues with this patch, may I have your > Reviewed-by: ?
Sure. It should eventually be replaced with a better xpmPipeThrough, but seems perfectly fine. Reviewed-by: Ángel González <inge...@zoho.com> _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
