Implicit passive grabs are now properly allocated grabs (b601ea769f1b8a4d7f19e9d4a13541c78e865fe5), but they are not added to the resource system. This makes client lookup later hard for touch pointer emulation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> --- dix/events.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix/events.c index d57ce6a..f47820b 100644 --- a/dix/events.c +++ b/dix/events.c @@ -1541,6 +1541,9 @@ DeactivatePointerGrab(DeviceIntPtr mouse) if (ti->active && TouchResourceIsOwner(ti, grab_resource)) TouchListenerAcceptReject(mouse, ti, 0, XIRejectTouch); } + + if (wasImplicit) + FreeResource(grab->resource, RT_NONE); } /** @@ -1584,6 +1587,9 @@ ActivateKeyboardGrab(DeviceIntPtr keybd, GrabPtr grab, TimeStamp time, grabinfo->implicitGrab = passive & ImplicitGrabMask; CheckGrabForSyncs(keybd, (Bool) grab->keyboardMode, (Bool) grab->pointerMode); + + if (passive & ImplicitGrabMask) + FreeResource(grab->resource, RT_NONE); } /** @@ -1984,9 +1990,13 @@ ActivateImplicitGrab(DeviceIntPtr dev, ClientPtr client, WindowPtr win, if (inputMasks) xi2mask_merge(tempGrab->xi2mask, inputMasks->xi2mask); + if (!AddResource(tempGrab->resource, RT_PASSIVEGRAB, tempGrab)) { + BUG_WARN_MSG(1, "Failed to activate implicit grab. Behavior will be weird\n"); + return FALSE; + } + (*dev->deviceGrab.ActivateGrab) (dev, tempGrab, currentTime, TRUE | ImplicitGrabMask); - FreeGrab(tempGrab); return TRUE; } -- 1.7.11.7 _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel