On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:09:01AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >> > For non-PCI video devices, such as those found on many ARM embedded >> > systems, the X server currently requires the BusID option to specify the >> > full path to the DRM device's sysfs node in order to properly match it >> > against the probed platform devices. >> > >> > In order to allow X to start up properly if either the BusID option was >> > omitted or no configuration is present at all, the first video device is >> > used by default. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> >> > --- >> > Changes in v2: >> > - Add additional checks for safety (I don't think numDevs will ever be 0 >> > since a default will be generated if no configuration is present, but >> > it doesn't hurt to check anyway). Without these checks there is a >> > possibility of the X server crashing if no platform devices have been >> > found. >> > >> > hw/xfree86/common/xf86platformBus.c | 8 ++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86platformBus.c >> > b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86platformBus.c >> > index 0525e39..599d84a 100644 >> > --- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86platformBus.c >> > +++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86platformBus.c >> > @@ -377,6 +377,14 @@ xf86platformProbeDev(DriverPtr drvp) >> > continue; >> > } >> > >> > + /* >> > + * If all of the above fails, which can happen if X was started >> > without >> > + * configuration or if BusID wasn't set for non-PCI devices, use the >> > first >> > + * device by default. >> > + */ >> > + if (!foundScreen && xf86_num_platform_devices > 0 && numDevs > 0) >> > + foundScreen = probeSingleDevice(&xf86_platform_devices[0], drvp, >> > devList[0], 0); >> > + >> > /* if autoaddgpu devices is enabled then go find a few more and add >> > them as GPU screens */ >> > if (xf86Info.autoAddGPU && numDevs) { >> > for (j = 0; j < xf86_num_platform_devices; j++) { >> >> Can anyone review this patch? I think it is also a candidate for 1.13, >> since it fixes a regression from the 1.12 series. > > Can somebody merge this? The first version of this patch[0] was reviewed > by Adam Jackson and the fix is required to make xf86-video-modesetting > work on 1.13 and later X servers.
You need to send it to Keith with the reviewed by tag in the patch. Dave. _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel