Bryce Harrington <br...@canonical.com> writes: > So, feel free to revert the patches if the thinking is it's just adding > clutter, but you may still want the first patch in the series as it adds > a missing close(). We also found that having the server print out the > error code helped in diagnosing the problem.
Thanks! The diagnostic messages are probably useful, but let's revert the actual work-arounds so we're not stuck with mysterious code in the server. I'd appreciate it greatly if you would post a patch pulling the work-arounds out; I'll review and integrate it. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpXthLh1OQdn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
