On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 01:37:31AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 04:35:51PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > On 06/ 2/13 12:30 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > >XXX: should probably be fixed differently. > > >--- > > > xrandr.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > >diff --git a/xrandr.c b/xrandr.c > > >index da786cb..0b285a3 100644 > > >--- a/xrandr.c > > >+++ b/xrandr.c > > >@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@ crtc_set_transform (crtc_t *crtc, transform_t > > >*transform) > > > if (major > 1 || (major == 1 && minor >= 3)) > > > XRRSetCrtcTransform (dpy, crtc->crtc.xid, > > > &transform->transform, > > >- transform->filter, > > >+ __UNCONST(transform->filter), > > > transform->params, > > > transform->nparams); > > > } > > > > > > > Sorry, breaks the build since __UNCONST is not defined. > > Yeah, needs the bits > #ifndef __UNCONST > #define __UNCONST(x) (x) > #endif > like the other patch.
Sorry about that. A bit more helpful answer: the __UNCONST(x) that NetBSD uses is in /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h #define __UNCONST(a) ((void *)(unsigned long)(const void *)(a)) Do you want a patch for the two __UNCONST uses that has that fallback define (perhaps __XORG_UNCONST to avoid clashes), or is there a good common place to put it? > Better would be if we wouldn't need the unconst cast though :) That's still true :) Thomas _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel