On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 09:32:37AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 06/ 8/13 11:28 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:39:52PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >>On 06/ 2/13 01:38 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > >>>--- > >>> configure.ac | 4 +- > >>> src/netbsd_pci.c | 471 > >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > >>> 2 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-) > >> > >>Since that's a substantial amount of code, any chance of Signed-off-by tags > >>to indicate permission to contribute it to us? > > > >I have the confirmation in private email, I'll try to get him to post > >it publicly. > > We don't need a public post from the original author per se, but try to record > who gave/got the permission via the "Signed-off-by" tags in the commit > message: > > http://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches#Signing_off_and_reviewing
So in this case, would I add an "Acked-by" line for Michael and a "Signed-off-by" line for myself? Thomas _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
