On 06/25/13 09:34 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
clang complained (correctly):
warning: comparison of constant 768614336404564650 with expression
of type 'CARD32' (aka 'unsigned int') is always true
[-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
---
  src/Font.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/Font.c b/src/Font.c
index a32f740..ac18024 100644
--- a/src/Font.c
+++ b/src/Font.c
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ _XF86BigfontQueryFont (
            if (!(extcodes->serverCapabilities & CAP_VerifiedLocal)) {
                struct shmid_ds buf;
                if (!(shmctl(reply.shmid, IPC_STAT, &buf) >= 0
-                     && reply.nCharInfos < (LONG_MAX / sizeof(XCharStruct))
+                     && reply.nCharInfos < (INT_MAX / sizeof(XCharStruct))
                      && buf.shm_segsz >= reply.shmsegoffset + reply.nCharInfos 
* sizeof(XCharStruct) + sizeof(CARD32)
                      && *(CARD32 *)(addr + reply.shmsegoffset + reply.nCharInfos 
* sizeof(XCharStruct)) == extcodes->serverSignature)) {
                    shmdt(addr);


Technically LONG_MAX is correct, and the check is right for 32-bit systems,
while a no-op on 64-bit.   However, I've gone ahead and applied this patch
with the added note in the commit comment to explain:

    [While LONG_MAX is correct, since it's used in size_t math, the
     numbers have to be limited to 32-bit range to be usable by 32-bit
     clients, and values beyond that range are far more likely to be
     bugs in the data from the server than valid numbers of characters
     in a font.   -alan- ]

    Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>
    Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com>

And pushed: To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/lib/libX11
   383e2b0..6d92608  master -> master

--
        -Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
         Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to