>> I found these in the X shipped with NetBSD 5.2, which is X11R7 of >> [some] stripe - I'm not sure how to get any more detailed version. > "Xorg -version" should provide that.
X.Org X Server 1.6.3 Release Date: 2009-7-7 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: NetBSD/amd64 - Current Operating System: NetBSD DP-Frank.Rodents-Montreal.ORG 5.2 NetBSD 5.2 (DP) #0: Tue May 14 03:28:46 EDT 2013 mo...@dp.rodents-montreal.org:/home/mouse/kbuild/DP amd64 Build Date: 09 July 2009 12:14:03AM I know at least some of that is false; I've done a build-and-reinstall of the world, including X, many times since 2009 (I didn't even _have_ this hardware in 2009, and a self-hosted rebuild is one of the first things I do on new hardware). And I know I did a rebuild in the last few days, in order to get those two fixes! Perhaps the NetBSD build machinery isn't updating whatever that is based on or something. I can also supply copies of the source in question. But, really, if dix/dispatch.c looks similar enough for those patches to apply, then the bugs are probably present; ProcCreateCursor has changed little between X11R4 and the X11R7 I was working with, so, unless someone suddenly started doing drastic rototills, it is probably still pretty much the same. That's one reason I wrote that test program I mentioned. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel