On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com>wrote:
> On 13 September 2013 06:01, Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > If I'm reading this correctly this will cause the build to fail if > > you don't give it the disable flag if xatracker is missing? > > I'm on the fence if we want this, is this a problem you have > > run into? > > Correct, defaults to enabled and will fail if the dependencies are not > present. If required I could add an "auto" option alongside the > explicit on and off options. > > As a best practise our metadistro (Yocto Project) avoids > auto-detection because it leads to undeterministic builds: one day the > build order changes and if you forgot an explicit dependency, the > compilation changes. > Ah you are right that does make sense, thank you for explaining, I will commit this patch later, and it is Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <ja...@vmware.com> Cheers, Jakob.
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
