-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/20/2013 12:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 21:43:02 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > >> On 09/18/2013 02:43 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 22:50:46 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: >>> >>>> Chris, I'm guessing this won't affect you but can you verify >>>> that? I don't want a nasty loop where fixing one things >>>> breaks another. >>>> >>> Err, what are you talking about? >>> >> >> Hi Julien, You know, when one person's bugfix causes a bug for >> another person. Then fixing that bug causes another bug, and so >> on. Very unlikely I know, but ... >> > Hi Matt, > > You're not going to ask every single bug reporter ever to test > every single patch that comes in, though, so I'm wondering what's > special about this one...
Hi Julien, Oh heck no. Just that the gcc 4.8 patch was a bit of a pain and that final week's hold up was for it. Then only a few days later there was another patch for gcc 4.8. I got paranoid. It's was a special case, and unnecessary as it turns out. Matt - -- Matt Dew <mar...@osource.org> Key signature: 0xF7C3 BEC3 Fingerprint: FDB1 9D94 C573 DC29 BCCB 2F9F A6BF 3771 F7C3 BEC3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSPSNqAAoJEKa/N3H3w77Da6sH/0wnWklSLOrNa+KX15dRBW/6 HOija+ZbDvQ6EIxbutYyaOAl7f30II2rcxs5BK2h3FY2sSn2lTFlgiPDxCaZQ8RZ bSwndnQnVL3TUZcrBvMsuc2faQCrCOr7FOQCNF9GUynifpcc4swkrvLlVI5J2Kl9 +DsDcXBWhUfnqJ57gQuaLRce/hT46pEHtP3DckirGOnet0zGQeqZtYwD8x4+Z0y9 Z+5Sdq+SbGmA6R4jhFIBXgfnhI1czHn9vuzTdMrqvk2pxr2nu6Iy1y/VCxAQ6A1f qQgO48tmuXXlEOCj+e2/0mTdt715tKGBJk3dUf8oyl8LX03fHtW08N4+cRFWdFo= =jjMo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel