I've opened a X.Org bug to keep track of this discussion. See:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71258

CANTATE DOMINO CANTICUM NOVUM
QUIA MIRABILIA FECIT

Laércio


2013/11/1 David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com>

> Hi
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Laércio de Sousa <lbsous...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I would append another approach to the list:
> >
> > * For non-seat0 seats, X server should open no VT at all. Currently, even
> > with -sharevts option, it seems Xorg does open a VT, although it can't
> > control this.
>
> Yes, please! We shouldn't touch VTs at all if we're not on seat0. I
> never understood why we have -sharedvt.. It doesn't make any sense.
> Furthermore, if we remove -sharedvt we could also run the xserver with
> CONFIG_VT=n.
>
> Thanks
> David
>
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to