Peter Harris <phar...@opentext.com> writes: > I'm curious about this hunk. It isn't hurting anything, but I don't see > where it would be needed or used. > > xcb.h already has xcb_ge_event_t. Is this hunk solely for the <doc> > section? Or for the #define XCB_GE 35 ?
My libxcb commits remove the definition from there; seemed quite reasonable to define the protocol for XGE events in the X protocol specification rather than hard-coding it in libxcb. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpiRaypQ61WZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
