Uli Schlachter <psyc...@znc.in> writes: > And this comes up on the xcb list two days before this deadline and only does > so > accidentally...?
Well, many of us appear to forget that xcb has a magic special list, separate from xorg-devel... > If this patch does get in, I am OK with cherry-picking these patches into a > branch and doing a release from that. But the general consensus with the whole > XKB (and more) situation seems to be that master is not in a > releasable state. I'll take your word for it, but master looks like it has some useful fixes on it at present. Backing out the XKB patch would be trivial, if you think the rest of master deserves a release. > OK, I don't have a problem with this going in if it gets ACK'd by the "right > people" (whoever that is exactly). Since I will be offline, someone else would > then need to be convinced to do a new release based on 1.9.1 + these patches. I can easily do a release; either 1.9.2 with just the new stuff cherry-picked on top, or a 1.10 release from master. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpoxykDsUM24.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
