>> Hooray for LP64. These need to be (void *) (uintptr_t) foo. Actually, I suspect there is a semantic bug here. If the integers are smaller than pointers, they don't have as much information content as pointers, so forcibly shoehorning them into pointers with the help of additional casts is almost certain to be a wrong thing.
If this is just for printing, as implied elsewhere in the thread, I think changing the printf format is a much better fix (I'd guess %u or %#x instead of %p - I haven't dug up the original code). If nothing else, casting them to void * to print implies they're "really" pointers to someone reading the code, which they'd better not be if they're being kept in 32-bit ints on 64-bit-pointer architectures. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
