Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> writes: > Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> writes: > >> I expected DamageReportDamage() to be used instead, but this is safe >> because we're using DamageReportNone (and leaving the blockhandler to do >> our paint). > > I didn't want other root damage trackers to receive damage though, this > avoids that. We could also expose a new per-damage damage api. It could > be called DamageDamageDamage, which has a certain ring to it...
That appears to be what DamageReportDamage() does. (As opposed to DamageDamageRegion(), which I suspect you were thinking of).
pgpsnX8bRErkv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
