09.02.2014 00:56, Egbert Eich wrote:
In fact, I've rechecked and we are now using a much simpler patch which does drop the link local address rather than fiddling with the order. This seems to have been used for quite a while now. I've ported this to the current Xserver head. See attachment - would this be ok?
Not tested, but looks OK. Although, if I were you, I'd replace "no way of telling to the other end" with "no way of guessing for the other end" in the commit message. But I don't insist.
Even if the protocol had the field for that, there is simply no information available on any other host to fill it correctly.
-- Alexander E. Patrakov _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
