Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]> writes: > Ok, so the recent patch wave did not also address all commented out > warning flags. Just asking in case some of them needed to be > re-instated.
With Alan's -Wlogical-op change, I still have only a single warning (bswap_CARD64 in indirect_dispatch_swap.c). If you can reproduce this on your machine (and, I hope that is trivial), then you should feel free to play with compiler flags and send email to the list about what you find; if the pain threshold isn't too high, we can fix the warnings and add the flags to the default set. Alternatively, you could file bugs with the results. I've rejected only one X server patch because it generated additional warnings; does anyone think that this is too onerous on other developers? -- [email protected]
pgpy5dbbpzBsL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
