Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> writes: > This code is nonsensical. You end up creating a screen-sized pixmap > that's totally detached from everything else, which you then listen for > damage on, which means you'll never hear any damage, which means your > shadow update hooks will never get called. Any driver using this would > be sorely disappointed.
I have this vague memory that a caller of this would actually pull the pixmap out of the shadow code and use that as the screen pixmap. I'm not sure that's correct, but I can't see how else this could be useful either. In any case, that would be crazy. Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpOSOqnEbfFz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
