14.12.2014 11:29, Keith Packard wrote:
This just calls the existing function to create the relevant Xv
adaptor and hook it up.
With that, could anyone please write (preferably in the form of a blog
post) a feature comparison of the existing card-specific drivers with
the modesetting driver?
I.e., why should I use nouveau when modesetting exists and even provides
DRI2/3, GL and Xv?
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com>
---
hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
index cad9000..d9a2982 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
@@ -1103,6 +1103,19 @@ ScreenInit(ScreenPtr pScreen, int argc, char **argv)
xf86DPMSInit(pScreen, xf86DPMSSet, 0);
+#ifdef GLAMOR
+ if (ms->drmmode.glamor) {
+ XF86VideoAdaptorPtr glamor_adaptor;
+
+ glamor_adaptor = glamor_xv_init(pScreen, 16);
+ if (glamor_adaptor != NULL)
+ xf86XVScreenInit(pScreen, &glamor_adaptor, 1);
+ else
+ xf86DrvMsg(pScrn->scrnIndex, X_ERROR,
+ "Failed to initialize XV support.\n");
+ }
+#endif
+
if (serverGeneration == 1)
xf86ShowUnusedOptions(pScrn->scrnIndex, pScrn->options);
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
