On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com> writes: > >> well, adreno doesn't do native quads, and I think vc4 doesn't >> either... so an alternative path is useful. Perhaps we should cook up >> an extension to indicate that quads are emulated if just avoiding >> quads across the board is not a good option for some hw... > > Would GLES just be a better option for this hardware then? Is there > anything that Glamor uses from GL which *isn't* emulated? >
hmm, what minimum gl and gles version do we need to expose instanced drawing? Or any other useful extensions that glamor could use? Not sure if that would make a difference between gl vs gles? At any rate, we still have the problem that glamor will see that the driver supports both gles and gl, and would have to somehow choose which paths to use.. although I guess we could just pick based on vendor name for freedreno/vc4/etc.. (But one of these days I'll actually get around to building latest xserver and start playing and benchmarking w/ glamor... and once I actually start getting into the code I may actually have something intelligent to suggest :-P) BR, -R > -- > -keith _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel