This matches the GCCUSESGAS path from the old monolith build (where that
macro was actually set), and fixes the build on modern OSX.

Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com>
---
 hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h | 49 +-------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h b/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h
index 85fb35c..5a1fdac 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h
+++ b/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ extern _X_EXPORT unsigned int inl(unsigned int port);
 #include <machine/pio.h>
 #endif                          /* __NetBSD__ */
 
-#elif defined(__amd64__)
+#elif defined(__amd64__) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__ia64__)
 
 #include <inttypes.h>
 
@@ -967,53 +967,6 @@ inl(unsigned PORT_SIZE port)
 
 #endif                          /* NDS32_MMIO_SWAP */
 
-#elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__ia64__)
-
-static __inline__ void
-outb(unsigned short port, unsigned char val)
-{
-    __asm__ __volatile__("out%B0 (%1)"::"a"(val), "d"(port));
-}
-
-static __inline__ void
-outw(unsigned short port, unsigned short val)
-{
-    __asm__ __volatile__("out%W0 (%1)"::"a"(val), "d"(port));
-}
-
-static __inline__ void
-outl(unsigned short port, unsigned int val)
-{
-    __asm__ __volatile__("out%L0 (%1)"::"a"(val), "d"(port));
-}
-
-static __inline__ unsigned int
-inb(unsigned short port)
-{
-    unsigned char ret;
-    __asm__ __volatile__("in%B0 (%1)":"=a"(ret):"d"(port));
-
-    return ret;
-}
-
-static __inline__ unsigned int
-inw(unsigned short port)
-{
-    unsigned short ret;
-    __asm__ __volatile__("in%W0 (%1)":"=a"(ret):"d"(port));
-
-    return ret;
-}
-
-static __inline__ unsigned int
-inl(unsigned short port)
-{
-    unsigned int ret;
-    __asm__ __volatile__("in%L0 (%1)":"=a"(ret):"d"(port));
-
-    return ret;
-}
-
 #endif                          /* arch madness */
 
 #else                           /* !GNUC */
-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to