On 09.03.2016 05:57, Keith Packard wrote: > Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes: > >> It seems to work fine in my quick testing. However, I'm not sure it's >> worth it, given that v2 of patch 1 fixes holding on to the last HW >> cursor indefinitely, and given the churn it would cause for external >> drivers. > > I guess I don't see how this would have any effect on external drivers; > they shouldn't be looking inside the xf86CrtcConfig structure for the > cursor in any case.
Unfortunately, the reality is that at least the radeon and amdgpu drivers do use it. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
