Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> writes: > I suppose. The code is almost certainly broken as-is though, I can't > imagine trying to do both sigio and threaded input on the same fd would > go well (or be in any way reasonable to support).
Looking usbSigioReadInput, xf86AddEnabledDevice and xf86SigioReadInput shows that the existing code is just in-lining the old version of xf86AddEnabledDevice. I don't think we need to make this ABI dependent, we can just remove usbSigioReadInput and unconditionally call xf86AddEnabledDevice. With the old server code, it'd end up doing nothing different, and with the new server code, it will end up getting threaded input as desired. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
