Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 09:35:35PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>> This call wasn't converted to 'input_unlock()' when the SIGIO code was
>> removed from the server, and so when the queue growing was reworked to
>> be done from the input thread, it got left sitting here. As the caller
>> now manages the lock, we don't need to switch this to input_unlock at
>> this point.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net>
> without the configure.ac change, which I generally approve of too
> though.

Yeah, that's been sent separately; perhaps eric will see it tomorrow :-)

Thanks.

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to