Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes: > Adding Marek and Nicolai, maybe they have some feedback from a GL > (driver) perspective. > > > On 23/08/16 10:41 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> >> >> [airlied: rebased onto master - >> I left WO alone as it's more like the GL interface >> review suggested changing it to bits.] > > After realizing that patch 2 can only affect the !ZPixmap case, I tested > this series with > > x11perf -putimagexy{10,100,500} -shmputxy{10,100,500} > > and to my surprise, all of the numbers went down by around an order of > magnitude (using radeonsi on Kaveri). I investigated a little bit what's > going on:
I should have replied before. Based on the performance numbers, I've considered these patches rejected.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel