Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes:

> Adding Marek and Nicolai, maybe they have some feedback from a GL
> (driver) perspective.
>
>
> On 23/08/16 10:41 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
>> 
>> [airlied: rebased onto master -
>> I left WO alone as it's more like the GL interface
>> review suggested changing it to bits.]
>
> After realizing that patch 2 can only affect the !ZPixmap case, I tested
> this series with
>
>  x11perf -putimagexy{10,100,500} -shmputxy{10,100,500}
>
> and to my surprise, all of the numbers went down by around an order of
> magnitude (using radeonsi on Kaveri). I investigated a little bit what's
> going on:

I should have replied before.  Based on the performance numbers, I've
considered these patches rejected.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to