Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 12:19 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> >> > >> > As pointed out in the ABI tracker[1], epoxy has gone through a few >> > non-backwards compatible ABI changes, yet preserved the DSO name. > > I don't particularly object to bumping the required version, but... > >> > Most noticeable of which, from xserver POV, in epoxy_has_egl_extension() >> > - s/EGLDisplay */EGLDisplay/. > > This happens not to matter. If you read the corresponding commit you'll > see that the parameter was always treated as an opaque pointer anyway: > > https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/commit/e20b3ce6c7895f355fd1bad81b45341d98b5ee76 > >> > Eric, iirc Dave had some ideas about moving libepoxy to fd.o [+ making >> > it the canonical/upstream source] and was looking for your blessing. >> > >> > How is that going ? The state of the github repo looks tragic. >> >> ajax and anholt were talking about epoxy's status at XDC. Cc'ing ajax. > > I'm honestly on anholt's side here about leaving upstream on github. > fdo is lovely and all but the contribution model for people not already > in posession of an fdo account is terrible. Moving epoxy to fdo would > be a step backwards, and we should continue to hold out on that front > until fdo grows better collaborative hosting. > > The more serious issue to me is that epoxy needs a release, and that > release should involve merging up the various forks on github. (This is > an argument _in favor_ of github: not only was it easy for people to > create their forks, but we can track them all down easily.) I'm sure > epoxy isn't Eric's first priority (which is entirely reasonable) so > it's kind of up to him how to proceed here.
I've said it before a couple of times, but it stands: The next step for epoxy is that someone needs to look into YaronCT's fork and decide if we should just bless it as the maintained upstream.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
