Quoting Keith Packard (2017-11-21 12:51:24) > Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> writes: > > > Also, git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/newproto appears to contain > > the script used to generate the merged repo. > > Right, that's probably more useful today. The trick was to get the > headers merged without losing any of the history. > > > I would be entirely in favor of merging the protocol header repos, > > fwiw. For that matter I'd be in favor of generating them from the xcb > > xml, but let's burn one bridge at a time. > > Who wants to take another run at this wall? > > -- > -keith
Your script splits each proto into a subdirectory, does it really make sense to do that, or should the final proto package have everything together in the root? Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
