Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> writes: > While in person discussions can be efficient, I do wonder if limiting > them to people who can travel to XDC is how we end up burning out the > same folks over and over.
A good point. With corporate support for desktop computing seeming fairly limited, I suspect we're going to need some creative ideas on how to continue development. > I don't think the world is yet ready to stop using X altogether, but > it's getting harder and harder for us to keep X alive. Adam and others have spent the last years reducing the code base. With xf86-video-modesetting and xf86-input-libinput, we have at least reduced the amount of work needed to just keep X running on new hardware. But, there's always the general churn of bug fixes and minor improvements, and those require management and testing to shepherd them to a release. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
