On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:50 AM Simon Ser <cont...@emersion.fr> wrote: > > On Monday, November 5, 2018 3:24 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I don't think it's a good idea to break Xwayland completely on > > compositors that don't implement wl_surface version 4 or greater. > > > > It would make sense to bind wl_compositor min(version, 4). > > This is intentional. I think it's reasonable to expect wl_compositor v4, it's > pretty old (3 years old). For instance, compositors not implementing v4 have > no > damage tracking with EGL. In KWin we still only support v3, but I currently have a patch up for review to support v4: https://phabricator.kde.org/D15910. Until the next Xserver is released, a version of KWin with this support should have been released and systems with older KWin versions wouldn't use the latest Xserver version. So from KWin's side I think it shouldn't be a problem.
Of course there are other compositors, but one would assume that a compositor with Xwayland support on latest Xserver is able to speak v4 or should be made ready to do this quickly. _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
