>  I don't think there's a configure flag for it but you can hack around that
 >  locally.


Thanks Peter, now I found it.

But I'm still perplexed: I think that a software package should fully
respect the prefix it is given at configuration time.
Think about the most common GNU+Linux distributions: they usually put
package files as managed by their package systems under the /usr tree and
leave /usr/local for software built locally, for example using the
autotools (which in fact use /usr/local as default prefix).

What do you think about modifying this? Could it break something else?


Warmly,
Andrea Monaco
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to