http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12880
--- Comment #7 from Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-18 10:53:31 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but why is it necessary to extract the physical > size from the bios tables when it is being correctly reported in the monitor > EDID information? Might it make sense to use the EDID information until it is > possible to read the size from the bios tables? (Depending on the predicted > time to get that working, of course) > If it's available in the EDID, we use it, but not all laptop panels provide an EDID. In cases without an EDID, we may be able to get the physical size out of the bios tables, in other cases we have no physical size information period. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati
