On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Roland Scheidegger > <rscheidegger_li...@hispeed.ch> wrote: >> Am 05.12.2011 21:51, schrieb Dave Airlie: >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Roland Scheidegger >>> <rscheidegger_li...@hispeed.ch> wrote: >>>> IIRC this is not only true for r200. Might be true for r300 too, and >>>> r100 (possibly not rv100) even. Looks good otherwise though. >>> >>> Yeah I've been trying to solve it as I find it, I found it definitely >>> on rv250/rv280, r200 I'm not 100% sure on but will check that. >>> >>> my rv100 definitely doesn't need it, but I don't have simple access to >>> an rv200 or r100 yet, might be able to get an M7 tomorrow. >>> >>> Good point for r300->r500 should probably check that, but we should be >>> enabling tiling on those by default anyways. >>> >> >> I think it might be always tiled for anything below r600 except the >> rv100 (and the igp-based rv100s). Of course, with different tiling patterns. >> I'm not 100% sure though, but I remember some differences there between >> r100 and rv100 (it is possible though just the tiling pattern was >> different). > > Okay so I've tested now on an M7 laptop, and it has always tiled depth, > r200, rv250 and rv280 are always tiled, and my rv100 has never tiled. > > The code in mesa now passes readPixSanity on all the ancient > crap^Wradeons I can beg or borrow access to. > > In theory color tiling should also work fine enabled, and it seems to, > not seeing and piglit regressions apart from noise between > tiled/untiled runs.
I think r100 is always tiled as well. I think it's just rv100 and rs1xx variants that are linear. Alex > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > xorg-driver-ati mailing list > xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org > http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati > _______________________________________________ xorg-driver-ati mailing list xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati