Quoting Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 20:50 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote: >> Jesse Barnes a écrit : >> > This is mainly a smoke test for the final 2.5.0 release which I >> hope to do on >> > Monday. Please give it a try and let me know if you run into >> build issues, >> > etc. >> >> configure wants libdrm 2.4.0 which has yet to be released. I've tried >> tweaking configure.ac to get it to build on non-GEM drm (which was >> announced to be still supported for 2.5, iirc) but then I get massive >> failure in src/i830.h about "dri_bo" being undefined. >> >> So I gave up and installed mesa and libdrm from git, but then I get DRM >> errors in dmesg and rendering errors in Firefox 3 and gnome-terminal >> (both of which use render). >> >> And if I start a GEM kernel, X doesn't even start. See my previous post >> on intel-gfx. > > libdrm 2.4.0 is released. > > http://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm/ > > I couldn't find any clearer release process for it than "tag it and dump > a tarball into this directory" -- if any other DRM maintainer-types want > to suggest an appropriate process, I'd love to hear. > > -- > Eric Anholt > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
Hi, btw building the libdrm 2.4.0 tarball (or the git master) still gives libdrm.so.2.3.0 Probably, line 25 of libdrm/Makefile.am: libdrm_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 2:3:0 -no-undefined should have been changed to: libdrm_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 2:4:0 -no-undefined Cheers, Stefano _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg