On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 22:00 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > >> Apparently, the current incarnation of EXA is built on the assumption that > >> everything should be accelerated, and that when it isn't, it's a bug. > >> Hence, > >> it pays no attention whatsoever to the performance of software rendering. > > > That's not 'strong vocabulary' but simply baseless flamebait. > > Sorry if you took it that way. > > I think you'll agree that current incarnations of EXA do some rather silly > things when some, but not all operations in a sequence can be > accelerated.
Nothing can be done about generic statements like this, only about specific examples with corresponding backup information such as profiles, control flow analysis, ... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg