On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 03 of December 2008, Dan Nicholson wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Could tinderbox be building xserver with all features enabled? Right now >> > some features are not build-tested and that ends with unbuildable xserver >> > with these features (dmx case for example). >> >> Last I checked, dmx was broken, and I don't think anyone has done >> anything to fix it. > > Then it should be removed from repo like it happened with xprint. What's the > point to keep such stuff if no one cares?
Unlike xprint, I believe people actually think dmx is useful, it just hasn't gotten much love. However, David Reveman did a lot of dmx work that hasn't gone to master yet. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-October/039803.html > (dmx was building in 1.5.x for me; no idea if worked though) Ah. It may have been before 1.5 when I last tried to build dmx. -- Dan _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg