milnser43...@yahoo.com wrote: > At the same time important backwards compatability upon which many of our > applications depend, have been removed including PEX, Ximage, MIT-SUNDRY, > XFree86-Misc, among others creating a massive incompatability headache. A > prime principle of the X.org project should be to retain backwards > compatability so that older applications may still run. Stop destroying > backwards compatability and get around to fixing the memory leaks for god > sake. X.org also seems to be intent on locking itself out of the > embedded/cell market by removing support for low depth displays. I am > throughly dismayed and disgusted with X.org.
If this backwards compatibility is causing you such a massive headache, why has it taken you 7 years to complain to us that XFree86 removed PEX & XIE support in their 4.2.0 release in 2002, several years before the current X.Org organization was formed and our development tree was forked from their 4.4rc2 release? http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/RELNOTES2.html#5 -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
