So you have an MLS shared memory?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:47 PM, McDonald, Michael-p7438c <michael.mcdon...@gdc4s.com> wrote: > > > Mike McDonald > GDC4S JLTV > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Adam Jackson [mailto:a...@nwnk.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:02 AM >> To: McDonald, Michael-p7438c >> Cc: xorg@lists.freedesktop.org >> Subject: Re: Intel Q35/Q45 fb driver? >> > >> If so, your copy chain (assuming PutImage not ShmPutImage) looks like: >> >> app -> vm kernel -> vm X server -> hv -> host X server -> gpu > > It's actually > > app -> vm kernel -> vm X server -> shared memory > > shared memory -> xapp -> > kernel -> host X server ->gpu > > The first chain runs independantly of the second. The frame rates I > mentioned are only refering to the second chain. Of there are multiple > instances of the first chain running, each at a different security > level. > >> Which is pretty dire. You could just run the app in the vm >> but display >> on the host's X server > > Nope, that would violate security requirements for separation. > > Mike McDonald > _______________________________________________ > xorg mailing list > xorg@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg > _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg