On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:01:19PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Luc Verhaegen <l...@skynet.be> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:36:17PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Luc Verhaegen <l...@skynet.be> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > See, this was exactly the problem here. It _was_ a freedesktop admin.
> >> > And it was pretty clear that it was that from the onset too. Mailing
> >> > fd.o admins, even if i could've dug up an email address in the split
> >> > second that i wrote the email (heck, i even mistyped repository), was
> >> > not the right course of action.
> >>
> >> So you mailed 2 mailing lists consisting of 2-300 people who could do
> >> nothing about it?
> >>
> >> nice work.
> >>
> >> Dave.
> >
> > Heh.
> >
> > I already wasted quite some time on the actions of one of your
> > colleagues, i guess i can waste some more time on yours.
> >
> > Stop the counter-attack dave, it's far too obvious what you are doing
> > here.
> 
> Paranoid much? still seeing faces in the dark?
> 
> Like really if you can't answer a simple question about why you mailed
> 200 people who couldn't do any investigation of the issue without
> going off the deep end I have to wonder.
> 
> Dave.

Not this again. It is getting rather old, and especially in light of 
recent events, it seems rather out of place too.

Stop it, it's ridiculous.

Luc Verhaegen.
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to