Hi Qi,

In the latest Xplor-NIH version (2.44), the atomic radii in the default protein 
parameters are those of MolProbity.  This is a recent change, implemented as of 
version 2.43.  The new radii yield significantly fewer clashes PROVIDED THAT 
they are scaled by a factor of 0.9, instead of the 0.8 of the older radii.


What's probably happening is that you are using the new radii (in version 2.43) 
within a script that explicitly sets up the scale factor ("repel" variable) to 
the older value, which will result in worse clashes.


There are different ways to fix this:


1) Locate the 0.8 in your script and replace it by 0.9.


2) Simply invoke protocol.initNBond() for the nonbonded setup, which 
automatically recognizes the version of protein parameters being used, and 
chooses the corresponding radius scale factor. This would look like this:


rampedParams.append( StaticRamp("protocol.initNBond()") )


which would set a uniform scale factor for the simulated annealing stage. You 
can find an example in eginput/gb1_rdc/anneal.py.


3) Use the new nonbonded potential, which also automatically sets the 
appropriate radius scale factor. You can find an example in 
eginput/gb1_rdc/refine.py


Suggestions 2 and 3 are based on the latest Xplor-NIH version (2.44).


I hope this helps.


Best,


Guillermo Bermejo




________________________________
From: Hu, Qi, Ph.D. <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 5:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Xplor-nih] violation in 2.43

Dear Charles and Other Users,

I used Xplor-NIH 2.39 and Xplor-NIH 2.43 for calculations. When I submitted my 
structures for PSVS and MolProbity evaluations, the reported vdw violations was 
much worse for Xplor-NIH 2.43 than for Xplor-NIH 2.39. I assume this is due to 
the different atom radii used in the two versions of Xplor-NIH. Would you have 
any suggestion on how to deal with the violations here? Should I go back to 
version 2.39 for furture calculations? I have not check if the version 2.44 has 
the same problem. Thank you very much for any comment.

Best regards,
Qi
_______________________________________________
Xplor-nih mailing list
[email protected]
https://dcb.cit.nih.gov/mailman/listinfo/xplor-nih

Reply via email to