-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jan--

> I've noticed a couple of previous posts that ask about ambiguous
> restraints in XPLOR (or CNS) or XPLOR-NIH, but have never seen an
> answer posted. The basic question again is how exactly are "or"
> statements dealt with during annealing?

I think this is covered here:
http://nmr.cit.nih.gov/xplor-nih/doc/current/python/ref/noePot.html
and here:
http://nmr.cit.nih.gov/xplor-nih/doc/current/xplor/node358.html#SECTION001920000000000000000

> 
> Take for example, the restraint:
>       assign (residue 1 and name HA) ((residue 2 and name HB*) or
> (residue  3 and name HB)) 2.900 1.800 4.000
> 
> (with a setting for the NOE averaging of "SUM")
> 
> My understanding based on the documentation is that this would end up
> requiring a R^-6 averaged satisfaction of the restraint for both
>       res 1 - HA -> res 2 HB*
>       res 1 - HA -> res 3 HB
> Is this understanding correct?

not precisely. Please see below.

> 
> A supplementary, more technical, question is - how is the R^-6
> averaging carried out? I could envision two possible methods. Is this
> carried out simply for each distance:
>       average of d(res 1 - HA res 2 - HB2) + d(res 1 - HA res 2 -
> HB3) + d (res 1 - HA res 3 - HB)
> 
> or, is this carried out such that each constraint is first averaged
> and then R^-6 averaged:
>       average of ({average of [d(res 1 - HA res 2 - HB2) + d(res 1 -
> HA  res 2 - HB3)]} + {d(res 1 - HA res 3 - HB)})
> 

with the default settings, sum averaging gives the following expression:

d = [ d(res 1 - HA res 2 - HB1)^(-6) + d(res 1 - HA  res 2 - HB2)^(-6) +
      d(res 1 - HA res 3 - HB)^(-6) ]^(-1/6)

This distance is quite similar to the shortest distance, if the next
shortest distance isn't too close. So this single restraint will not
restrain distances for both operands of the ``or'' statement. There is
nothing special about the or - or ``and'' statement in an NOE selection-
these just help choose which atoms to include in the sum.

hope this help--
Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFEBwEGPK2zrJwS/lYRAvqRAJoDt3KlKGODb1e4I7suFCeGJ/vHhACfSyyH
PwWXJpLaScnHHmzD9ovHTsQ=
=JQzU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to